A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: photoresist concern
photoresist concern
2003-08-01
[email protected]
2003-08-04
Rick Morrison
2003-08-04
Robert Black
2003-08-04
David Ovrokzky
2003-08-04
Michael Yakimov
2003-08-04
Mac McReynolds
2003-08-04
Rick Morrison
2003-08-04
[email protected]
2003-08-04
Justin Borski
2003-08-05
[email protected]
photoresist concern
Justin Borski
2003-08-04
Hello Anupama,

I cannot comment on the usual standards in this industry, but here where I
work the guidelines are that as soon as a female employee identifies to the
company that she is pregnant, the company removes her to an office or
paperwork job for the term of the pregnancy.  Relocation within the fab to
another work environment does not preclude exposure nor the associated
liabilities.

For a small company, we have some excellent safety policies, but for larger
companies, I think the expectation should be even more stringent safety
guidelines.

- Justin

Justin C. Borski
MEMS Program Manager
Advanced MicroSensors Inc.
[email protected]
www.advancedmicrosensors.com



-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 5:45 PM
To: [email protected]; Sarah McQuaide
Cc: Pahnit Seriburi; [email protected]
Subject: [mems-talk] photoresist concern


Hello MEMS community,

This is regarding reproductive disorders associated with the
working of photoresists. I was discussing with a colleague
of mine and it seems that in her past work in cleanrooms her
general observation was that numerous women of childbearing
age who were intimately involved in the lithography process,
were unable to bear children or had high incidences of
miscarriage.

I would like to know if others have made similar
observations or where such data can be found. Is it true
that the solvent vapors from the lithography process that
one is exposed to even when working under a well ventilated
fume hood, with a mask can result in
infertility/miscarriage?

I looked at some of the  MSDS of some of the photoresists we
commonly use in the lab - the AZ4620, 9260, 1512 and most of
them indicate that no harmful effect caused to the mother
will have no harmful effect on the fetus. I understand that
working in cleanroom esp with the lithography process is not
advisable during pregnancy but does anyone know of damage
that can be done by regular use.The developers & resist
srtip particularly EKC830 seem to be more harmful.

All of us are exposed to solvent fumes during spin-on,
pre/post bake, development. What is meant by overexposure?
3-4 hours/day
2-3days/week or 40+hrs a week only with lithography?

Any help towards information in this direction would be
greatly appreciated.

Looking fwd to hearing from you and working in a safe and
healthy environment

Sincerely
Anupama


>
> As this is secondhand information I do not want to become
> alarmed, but Anupama and I think this would be a good
> topic to research and discuss, possibly as a topic at our
> group meeting. I don't know if there is much in the way of
> published material - we may only find information via the
> internet- but it is a good issue for women in the lab to
> be conscious of.
>
> Cheers,
> Sarah
>
> Sarah McQuaide
> Research Engineer, Genomation Lab
> University of Washington Electrical Engineering Dept.
> (206) 616-1394

_______________________________________________
[email protected] mailing list: to unsubscribe or change your list
options, visit http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/mems-talk
Hosted by the MEMS Exchange, providers of MEMS processing services.
Visit us at http://www.memsnet.org/
reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Nano-Master, Inc.
Addison Engineering
Process Variations in Microsystems Manufacturing