A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: SU8 fabrication on coverglass
SU8 fabrication on coverglass
2005-12-26
[email protected]
2005-12-27
Jesse D Fowler
2005-12-27
[email protected]
2005-12-29
Zeta Tak For YU
2006-01-02
[email protected]
2006-01-03
Zeta Tak For YU
2006-01-03
[email protected]
Bubbling and burnt phenomena of AZ50 after exposure
2006-01-29
Yu, Zeta (Tak For)
2006-01-31
Yu, Zeta (Tak For)
SU8 fabrication on coverglass 1
2005-12-29
Zeta Tak For YU
2005-12-29
[email protected]
2005-12-28
Dwayne Dunaway
SU8 fabrication on coverglass
[email protected]
2005-12-26
Hi All,
   I am currently working on fabricating microfluidic channels on
coverglass using SU8-2025 and using the following protocol:
   1. Spin SU8 2025 on No. 1 coverglass.
       500 rpm -> 2000 rpm. Coverglass was blown with nitrogen before
spin coating.
    2. Pre-bake.
       65 degree C for  1 min and 95 degree C for 3 min.
    3. Exposure.
        1 min @ 4.5 mW/cm^2
    4. Post Bake
        65 degree C for 1 min and 95 degree C for 3 min.
    5. Development
        SU8 developer. No IPA rinsing.
    At first, the feature came out nicely, but recently, the success
rate dropped aggressively. I could see bright edges along the channels
and sometimes it is really difficult to develop out the un-crosslinked
polymer in the un-exposed area. It seems that the resist film in
unexposed area is shattered into small pieces.
    If you could kindly have a look at the following image
(http://base.google.com/base/items?oid=10375407859124322045), you may
find the Y shape channel (width 200 micron) surrounded by some
colorful bright edges. I suspect this bright edge is due to the
peel-off of SU8 from coverglass, but cannot figure out why it happens.
What puzzles me most is that by the same procedure, I can obtain
perfect channel if lucky enough. Unfortunately, I don't know what
"luck" means here. So the result changes from trial to trial without
an obvious consistent pattern. For example, I tried 10 samples today.
The first two were perfect. But the following were worse and worse.
For the last one, it takes barely 10 second to develop such edges
after I started development, but the unexposed resist wasn't desolved
even after 1 min.
    I tried different combination of process configuration before and
it seems that the above protocol is the best for me. But, as the
result is not reproducible, I doubt ...
    I would appreciate it very much if any of you could offer me some
hint on this issue and thanks for reading this message.

Best,
Liu Yu
reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
Process Variations in Microsystems Manufacturing
University Wafer
Addison Engineering
Mentor Graphics Corporation