A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: Ni is better or Pd as a diffusion barrier layer?
Ni is better or Pd as a diffusion barrier layer?
2006-08-07
Mehdi Ahmadi
2006-08-08
Christopher Tan
2006-08-23
Mehdi Ahmadi
Ni is better or Pd as a diffusion barrier layer?
Christopher Tan
2006-08-08
At what temperature and for how long will you be subjecting the system to?


Chris Tan

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Mehdi Ahmadi
Sent: Monday, August 07, 2006 19:29
To: [email protected]
Subject: [mems-talk] Ni is better or Pd as a diffusion barrier layer?

Hello

I’m going to deposit two metal tracks one of Au and one of Ag over a
quartz wafer (using evaporation and in a lift-off process). I need an
adhesion layer which I’m going to use Ti. Also I need a diffusion
barrier (to avoid
corrosion) which I’m in doubt whether Ni is better or Pd (Palladium).
Can anyone help me whether (Ti/Ni/Ag, Ti/Ni/Au) is better or (Ti/Pd/Ag,
Ti/Pd/Au)?

Another question is: if I want to deposit a layer of platinum (Pt), do I
need a diffusion barrier layer such Ni or Pd?
I’m asking this because Pt can itself be used as a diffusion barrier
layer (similar to Ni and Pd).
reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
Mentor Graphics Corporation
Process Variations in Microsystems Manufacturing
University Wafer
Harrick Plasma, Inc.