A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
2010-12-11
Mikael Evander
2010-12-11
Bill Moffat
2010-12-12
Mikael Evander
2010-12-12
Andrew Sarangan
2010-12-12
Gareth Jenkins
2010-12-13
Bill Moffat
2010-12-13
Bill Moffat
2010-12-13
Yifan Wu
2010-12-15
Adrian Papas
2011-01-28
Mikael Evander
2011-01-28
Andrew Sarangan
2011-01-28
Mikael Evander
2011-01-28
Andrew Sarangan
2011-01-28
Dietrich Lueerssen
SU-8 3000 vs 2000 adhesion
Mikael Evander
2010-12-11
Hi all!

I was wondering if anyone has some kind of input regarding how much better the
adhesion of SU-8 3000 is compared to the 2000 formulation. I'm trying to make a
10- 20 um wide, 5 um high and up to 10 mm long "barrier"on a glass wafer. I did
my first tests with SU-8 2005 this week and noticed that the adhesion was
terrible. Very few of the barriers remained intact and after dicing the wafers
most of them were gone. My wafers were piranha washed and HMDS-treated just
before spinning the SU-8.

I've been reading a bit and people usually recommend making sure that the
exposure time is enough, doing a low temperature PEB, ramping of the hot plates,
having a very clean and dehydrated wafer. Something that also comes up a lot is
to use SU-8 3000 instead as it is supposed to have increased adhesion. My
question is if anyone can comment on how well the 3000 formulation seems to
adhere to glass substrates. I need the structure to remain intact as it will be
a mechanical part of a microfluidic device.

Many thanks and have a great weekend!


/Mikael
reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
MEMStaff Inc.
The Branford Group
Process Variations in Microsystems Manufacturing
Harrick Plasma, Inc.