Hi I also agree with Michael.
some mails are useful and good torespond. but mabe 1/10 ratio.
(sorry) Usenet is acceptable or Can we sub divide our mail list by
category ?
 Example : 1) Matrial 2) Process 3) device & Application ?
It's not ideal but hard to read all mails.
Takahide

-- At 09:03 99/02/19 -0500, you wrote:
 > I would tend to agree.  I'm receiving about 20 e-mails
 > a day from this reflector and it gets mixed in with all
 > my other e-mails.
 > It would certainly be more convenient and organized
 > if this were set up as a USENET newsgroup.
 > Regards,
 > Doug Finke
 > MEMS Wafer Foundry Business Unit
 > Standard Microsystems Corporation
 > Michael Gaitan  on 02/18/99 08:42:46 AM
 > Please respond to [email protected]
 >
 > To:   [email protected]
 > Subject:  Newsgroup?
 > Dear All:
 > I find this group very informative.
 > I think that the volume of email on this group
 > is high enough that it would be useful to make this a
 > newsgroup instead.  I understand
 >  that you can access prior listings from this group at the web site:
 > http://mems.isi.edu/archives/Discussion_Group/index.html
 > but the number of mailings and responses is large enough that
 > a newsgroup format
 > would be much more useful for me.  Anyone else share this opinion?
 > Michael Gaitan, PhD
 > MicroElectroMechanical Systems
 > Semiconductor Electronics Division
***************************************
Takahide Inoue
Director
ADPL Project
Sony US Research Labs.
Tel 408-955-4279
Fax 408-955-6070
E-mail [email protected]
***************************************