A MEMS Clearinghouse® and information portal
for the MEMS and Nanotechnology community
RegisterSign-In
MEMSnet Home About Us What is MEMS? Beginner's Guide Discussion Groups Advertise Here
News
MEMSnet Home: MEMS-Talk: Re: Economical Mask-Making Technique Using Desk-Top Publishing
Re: Economical Mask-Making Technique Using Desk-Top Publishing
1995-06-16
George Cooper
1995-06-16
Yuchong Tai
1995-06-16
[email protected]
1995-06-17
Ash Parameswaran
1995-06-19
Christopher G. Levey
Re: Economical Mask-Making Technique Using Desk-Top Publishing
Ash Parameswaran
1995-06-17
>Limitation is around 20 um (although smaller than 50 um is tough),
>when contact aligner (i.e., 1:1) is used for litho.
>>Prof. CJ Kim
I agree that the resolution below 25um is difficult. But, it depends on what
type of linotronic printer the DTP office use. Typically any popular DTP uses
2540 DPI, there are machines that produce 3386 DPI and there is one in the
market that offers >4000DPI resolution.

Since 2540 DPI is wanted by the regular DTP customers, atleast in Vancouver,
the cost of producing that output is the cheapest.

We have tried with 3386 and We have successfully produced 10 um feature size
with +or- 3um error in alignment accuracy between one end of a wafer to other
end (4"). But the cost of producing a 3386 DPI sheet to the resolution we get
is not worth the money.

There is one other factor, that is what type of environment one has to transfer
the pattern onto the glass plate. If the dark-room in which the printing is
done to produce the plates is not very clean then there will be lots of dust
marks etc that would ruin the quality of plate.

Ash


reply
Events
Glossary
Materials
Links
MEMS-talk
Terms of Use | Contact Us | Search
MEMS Exchange
MEMS Industry Group
Coventor
Harrick Plasma
Tanner EDA
Process Variations in Microsystems Manufacturing
MEMStaff Inc.
Mentor Graphics Corporation
MEMS Technology Review