I think the new format with your idea of releasing messages more often
really would add to the content as keep the excess number of responses
down to a minimum. The new format already has shown much more valuable
information exchange to the general list. Putting responses directly
into the archive is only one step above the old format but this new one
is 10 fold improvement. If some do not want to wade through the
occasional multiple inquiries, as any list, they can unsub and then read
the archives only.
I guess a question should be asked- are all messages and responses going
to be archived ?

Ken

[email protected] wrote:

> It's an interesting idea, but would mean several readers would spend
> their time responding to the same question, and if an answer is
> incorrect, no one else would ever see it and be able to offer a
> correction.  That would also mean the community wouldn't learn who's
> helpful and who's not.
>
> I think the list participants will soon learn to check for other
> responses before answering a query.  To make this work, I'll have to
> moderate individual messages quickly instead of approving a batch of
> them once a day, but that shouldn't be a problem.
>
> --
> A.M. Kuchling                     [email protected]
> Technical Staff, MEMS Exchange    Tel.: (703) 262-5368 x5374
> _______________________________________________
> [email protected] mailing list: to unsubscribe or change your list
> options, visit http://mail.mems-exchange.org/mailman/listinfo/mems-talk
> Hosted by the MEMS Exchange, providers of MEMS processing services.
> Visit us at http://www.mems-exchange.org/

--


Kmbh Associates
4968 Charter Road
Rocklin, CA  95765  U  S  A
510-714-5055 Efax- 510 217 4421 or 561 658 6136

High Purity Float Zone and Specialty CZ Silicon  for Power, IR and
Mirror Optics, Optoelectronics, MEMS, SOI, and other Semiconductor
applications. Service in SOI, Polishing SSP and DSP.
Quartz, Glass, Pyrex and Borofloat Wafer Supply. Anodic Bonding. SOG,
SOS.